Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Vainglory: Seeking the Praise of Men

by Edward P. Sri

Do you worry over what others think of you? Do you sometimes say or do things to draw attention to yourself? Do you replay conversations in your mind, wondering if you left the right impression? If so, you might be struggling with the vice known as vainglory.

According to St. Thomas Aquinas, "glory" denotes someone's excellence being known and approved by others. He explains that there is nothing wrong with others recognizing our good qualities and deeds. In fact, seeking to live in a way that inspires others to give glory to God and to pursue a more virtuous life is good. Jesus Himself said, "Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven"(Mt. 5:16). However, seeking human praise for its own sake is sinful. Such a person wants glory for himself more than he wants glory for God. He wants to receive the praise of men, which is a vain glory that is empty, fickle, and often off the mark. Aquinas explains that the glory we seek can be vain in one of three ways.

continue reading...




Thursday, October 7, 2010

tips for surviving the college 'jungle'


Archdiocese of Denver's young adult director offers tips for surviving the college 'jungle'

Straight talk about holding on to your faith, values and finances.
Chris Stefanick provides some really honest practical advice for incoming college
freshmen, who are facing the strange new world of life on campus. From credit cards
to co-ed relationships, the director of Youth, Young Adult and Campus Ministry tells
 it like it is in a new videoDENVER, CO (CNA) -
 Christopher Stefanick, theArchdiocese of Denver's director of Youth, Young Adult, and
 Campus Ministry, has recorded a new video for Catholic News Agency, discussing the
dangers that incoming college students will face as the school year begins.

A number of unprecedented challenges, Stefanick said, come with the new
independence of undergraduate life. The experience of separation from family, friends,
and previous parish communities, he said, was comparable to an animal being
"separated from the herd" for the first time.

But while this independence is exciting and offers new opportunities, it also involves
real dangers. Stefanick highlighted four key areas of life where college students must
be especially careful in order  to avoid compromising their futures and spiritual lives.
(Read the rest of the article here)

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Being Anti-Child via Aggie Catholics :)

Once again an enlightening post from our Aggie Catholic friends in College Station. In light of our Newman Night topic last night I thought this was an interesting post...

Being Anti-Child


Certain segments of our culture hate children. Some come from the radical environmental movement. Some are just looking out for #1. Regardless, the position is now being pushed as the best moral choice for the sake of the planet.

Here are some of the reasons given as to the reasons why not having kids is morally superior to having them:

1 - Because humans are destroying the planet.
Their solution - get rid of humans...


Read the rest of this blog post here.






and don't forget to watch this video...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZVOU5bfHrM&feature=player_embedded

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Our Moral Code is OUT OF DATE?!! Ridiculous.

The following is an excerpt from an article on cnn.com today. It was written by Yaron Brook who  is president of the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights and a columnist at Forbes.com;  and Onkar Ghate who is a senior fellow at the center. Brook is one of the speakers at The Economist's "Ideas Economy: Human Potential" conference in New York. To read the whole article please visit http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/09/16/brook.moral.code.outdated/index.html?hpt=T2 (make sure you read the comments after the article...)
The parts italicized  in red are my own comments on the article. Feel free to ad your own. Also, feel free to laugh.

Ask someone on the street to name a moral hero; if he isn't at a loss, he'll likely name someone like Jesus Christ or Mother Teresa. Why? Because they're regarded as people of faith who shunned personal profit for the collective good. No one would dream of naming Galileo, Darwin, Thomas Edison or John D. Rockefeller. Seems like a good start right? I agree with this.

Yet we should. It is they, not the Mother Teresas of the world, that we should strive to be like and teach our kids the same. Alert. Alert. Are these fools serious?

If morality is judgment to discern the truth and courage to act on it and make something of and for your own life, then these individuals, in their capacity as great creators, are moral exemplars. Put another way, if morality is a guide in the quest to achieve your own happiness by creating the values of mind and body that make a successful life, then morality is about personal profit, not its renunciation. So, it's ok to just invent your own definition and meaning of morality and apply it to all mankind? Sure, sure....even though nearly EVERY civilization since the beginning of time has upheld the virtues of selflessness and coming to the aid of those less fortunate than ourselves as moral, good and down right saintly. Just for fun though lets say that this innate knowledge of goodness from the beginning of time is useless and lets make up our own. Puh lease.

Monetary profit is just one of the values you have to achieve in life. But it is an eloquent representative of the whole issue, because at its most demanding, as exhibited by a Bill Gates or a Steve Jobs, making money requires a profound dedication to material production.The fact that earning money is ignored by most moralists, or condemned as the root of evil, is telling of the distance we must travel. My sarcasm fails me here because this is just too ridiculous. 

In effect, we need to turn the Billionaire's Pledge on its head. Can we turn Yaron and Onkar on their heads?

The world grants, at best, no moral recognition to Gates and Buffett for the personal fortunes they've created, but it awards them a standing ovation for giving their profits away. But the standing ovation belongs to the act of creation, the profit they brought into their own lives and anyone who traded with them. Saint Bill Gates, Pray for us. Start chiseling the statues.

If morality is about the pursuit of your own success and happiness, then giving money away to strangers is, in comparison, not a morally significant act. (And it's outright wrong if done on the premise that renunciation is moral.) It's NOT a morally significant act? Can you imagine if our morality was solely based on self preservation and looking out for number 1? Murder would be a moral good and mission work would be absolutely unacceptable. Helping the little lady cross the street would be a waste of your time and punishable by law. Why don't you just push her IN to the street? One less person to get in your way of success. 

Science, freedom and the pursuit of personal profit -- if we can learn to embrace these three ideas as ideals, an unlimited future awaits. Ugh.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Yaron Brook and Onkar Ghate. And no other decent human in the world. Amen.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Vocation Explosion!


The Coming Vocation Explosion

Where the Vocations Are

By Tim Drake @ http://www.ncregister.com/blog/tim-drake/

Take a look at some of the good news coming from various seminaries across the U.S. and you’ll find that the Holy Spirit is still at work in the Church.
The St. Paul Seminary is welcoming 33 new seminarians this fall, bringing its total number of men studying for the priesthood to 92. It’s the largest group the seminary has had since 1981. The seminarians for the Archdiocese of St. Paul-Minneapolis are from 14 dioceses and three foreign countries.
“Our strong enrollment reflects the growing number of men who are answering God’s call to the priesthood,” said Msgr. Aloysius Callaghan, rector of the St. Paul Seminary School of Divinity. “Their witness offers hope for the future of our Church.”
The Diocese of Saint Cloud, Minn., currently has more men in formation than it has had in more than 40 years.
Meanwhile, at Sacred Heart School of Theology – a seminary for men over the age of 30 – in Franklin, Wis., has accepted their largest enrollment class in 20 years. Forty-two new seminarians have signed up for the fall, putting enrollment at 210. The incoming class is nearly double last year’s.
“A lot of guys…[have] decided that all this stuff they’ve been chasing all of their lives is not as important as they thought it was,” said Father Thomas Knoebel, vice rector for the seminary.
The Dominican order, too, – both male and female – is experiencing what Sister Joseph Andrew, vocation director with the Dominican Sisters of Mary, Mother of the Eucharist in Ann Arbor, Mich., describes as a “spiritual explosion.”
On Aug. 28, the teaching order of the Dominican Sisters of Mary, Mother of the Eucharist, welcomed 22 new young women as aspirants to their community. The average age of the aspirants who just came in is 21. The average age of the entire group is 26. Founded in 1997 by four sisters originally from the Nashville Dominicans, the order presently has a total of 113 in the community.
The order is looking at the possibility of starting another mother house in either California or Texas, where land has already been donated.
Other Dominicans are experiencing growth as well.
On Aug. 2, the Dominican Province of St. Joseph accepted 21 men as novices. That’s the Eastern province’s largest novitiate class since 1966. As evidenced both in diocesan seminaries and religious orders, those entering religious life are trending younger. The average age of those coming into the Eastern province is 24.
The Nashville Dominicans thought that last year’s class would be their largest group of incoming postulants at 23. However, during the order’s 150th Jubilee, they had their biggest incoming class ever this year with 27 women entering. The order’s average age is 24.
Overall, the order is comprised of 274 nuns teaching in 34 schools across the country.
Why are young people being attracted to the Dominican order in such numbers?
Archbishop Augustine Di Noia had some thoughts on the question which he shared with the Capitulars of the Provincial Chapter on June 12.
“Our tradition is constituted by a unique convergence of qualities: optimism about the rationality and fundamental goodness of the natural order; an abiding certitude that divine grace and mercy are sheer gifts, unmerited and otherwise unattainable; a healthy realism about the peril of the human condition apart from this grace and mercy; a determination to maintain a God’s-eye-view of everything that exists and everything that happens; an appreciation of the inner intelligibility of everything that God has revealed about himself and us; a wholly admirable resistance to all purely moralistic accounts of the Catholic faith; an unfailing devotion to the Eucharist and the Passion, combined with an unshakable confidence in the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary; a zealous willingness to preach and teach about all this, in season and out, because we are convinced that the world is dying to hear it and dying from not hearing it; and, internally, a commitment to liturgical prayer, to study for the sake of the salvation of souls, and to a capitular mode of governance in a common life consecrated to God by poverty, chastity and obedience,” said Archbishop Di Noia. “This is a powerful combination, and the Church really does need us to be true to it now more than ever.”

Monday, September 13, 2010

The Prince of This World and the Evangelization of Culture


The Prince of This World and the Evangelization of Culture
Archbishop Chaput presented the following address at the Fifth Symposium Rome: Priests and Laity on Mission.
Life as a bishop - or at least the life of this bishop - does not leave much time to spend on poetry.  But a few years ago a friend loaned me a volume of Rainer Maria Rilke, and of course, Rilke's work can be quite beautiful.  In it, I found some lines of his verse that might help us begin our discussion today:
Slowly now the evening changes his garments
held for him by a rim of ancient trees;
you gaze: and the landscape divides and leaves you
one sinking and one rising toward the stars.
And you are left, to none belonging wholly,
not so dark as a silent house, nor quite
so surely pledged unto eternity
as that which grows to star and climbs the night.
To you is left (unspeakably confused)
your life, gigantic, ripening, full of fears,
so that it, now hemmed in, now grasping all, 
is changed in you by turns to stone and stars.
Philosophers and psychologists have offered a lot of different theories about the nature of the human person.  But few have captured the human condition better than Rilke does in those 12 lines.  We are creatures made for heaven; but we are born of this earth.  We love the beauty of this world; but we sense there is something more behind that beauty.  Our longing for that "something" pulls us outside of ourselves. 
Striving for "something more" is part of the greatness of the human spirit, even when it involves failure and suffering.  In the words of Venerable John Paul II, something in the artist, and by extension in all human beings, "mirrors the image of God as Creator."   We have an instinct to create beauty and new life that comes from our own Creator.  Yet we live in a time when, despite all of our achievements, the brutality and indifference of the world have never been greater.  The truth is that cruelty is also the work of human hands.  So if we are troubled by the spirit of our age, if we really want to change the current course of our culture and challenge its guiding ideas - and this is the theme of our session here today -- then we need to start with the author of that culture.  That means examining man himself. 
Culture exists because man exists.  Men and women think, imagine, believe and act.  The mark they leave on the world is what we call culture.  In a sense, that includes everything from work habits and cuisine to social manners and politics.  But I want to focus in a special way on those elements of culture that we consciously choose to create; things like art, literature, technology, music and architecture.  These things are what most people think of when they first hear the word "culture."  And that makes sense, because all of them have to do with communicating knowledge that is both useful and beautiful.  The task of an architect, for example, is to translate abstract engineering problems into visible, pleasing form; in other words, to turn disorder into order, and mathematical complexity into a public expression of strength and elegance.  We aresocial animals.  Culture is the framework within which we locate ourselves in relationship to other people, find meaning in the world and then transmit meaning to others.
In his 1999 Letter to Artists, John Paul II wrote that "beauty is the visible form of the good, just as the good is the metaphysical condition of beauty."  There is "an ethic, even a 'spirituality' of artistic service which contributes [to] the life and renewal of a people," because "every genuine art form, in its own way, is a path to the inmost reality of man and of the world."
He went on the say that "true art has a close affinity with the world of faith, so that even in situations where culture and the Church are far apart, art remains a kind of bridge to religious experience . . . Art by its nature is a kind of appeal to the mystery.  Even when they explore the darkest depths of the soul or the most unsettling aspects of evil, artists give voice [to] the universal desire for redemption."
Christianity is an incarnational religion.  We believe that God became man.  This has huge implications for how we live, and how we think about culture.  God creates the world in Genesis.  He judges it as "very good" (Gen 1:31).  Later he enters the world to redeem it in the flesh and blood of his son (Jn 1:14).  In effect, God licenses us to know, love and ennoble the world through the work of human genius.  Our creativity as creatures is an echo of God's own creative glory.  When God tells our first parents, "be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it" (Gen 1:28), he invites us to take part, in a small but powerful way, in the life of God himself. 
The results of that fertility surround us.  We see it in the great Christian heritage that still underpins the modern world.  Anyone with an honest heart will grant that the Christian faith has inspired much of the greatest painting, music, architecture and scholarship in human experience.  For Christians, art is a holy vocation with the power to elevate the human spirit and lead men and women toward God.
Having said all this, we still face a problem.  And here it is:  God has never been more absent from the Western mind than he is today.  Additionally, we live in an age when almost every scientific advance seems to be matched by some increase of cruelty in our entertainment, cynicism in our politics, ignorance of the past, consumer greed, little genocides posing as "rights" like the cult of abortion, and a basic confusion about what - if anything at all - it means to be "human."
Science and technology give us power.  Philosophers like Feuerbach and Nietzsche give us the language to deny God.  The result, in the words of Henri De Lubac, is not atheism, but an anti-theism built on resentment.   In destroying God, man sees himself as "overthrowing an obstacle in order to gain his freedom."  The Christian understanding of human dignity claims that we are made in the image and likeness of God.  Thomas Aquinas - whose feast we celebrate tomorrow - said that "In this [likeness to God] is man's greatness, in this is man's worth, in this he excels every creature."  But this grounding in God is exactly what the modern spirit rejects.
Of course, most people have never read Nietzsche. Nor will they.  Few have even heard of Feuerbach.  But they do experience the benefits of science and technology every day.  And they do live inside a cocoon of marketing that constantly strokes their appetites, makes death seem remote, and pushes questions about meaning and morality down into matters of private opinion.  The result is this.  While many people in the developed world still claim to be religious, their faith - in the words of the Pontifical Council for Culture - is "often more a question of religious feeling than a demanding commitment to God."   Religion becomes a kind of insurance policy for eternity.  Too often, it is little more than a convenient moral language for daily life.  And what is worse is that many people no longer have the skills, or even the desire, to understand their circumstances, or to think their way out of the cocoon.
Part of what blocks a serious awareness and rethinking of our current culture is the "knowledge economy" we have created.  In its 1999 statement Towards a Pastoral Approach to Culture, the Pontifical Council for Culture saw that the constant flow of "information provided by [today's] mass media . . . affects the way things are perceived: What people come to know is not reality as such, but what they are shown.  [The] constant repetition of selected items of information involves a decline in critical awareness, and this is a crucial factor in forming what is considered public opinion."  It also causes "a loss of intrinsic value [in the specific] items of information, an undifferentiated uniformity in messages which are reduced to pure information, a lack of responsible feedback, and a . . . discouragement of interpersonal relationships."  This is all true.  Much of modern technology isolates people as often as it brings them together.  It attacks community as easily as it builds it up.  It also forms the human mind in habits of thought and expression that are very different from traditional culture based on the printed word.  And that has implications both for the Word of God and for the Church.
There is one other important point here that even strong religious believers often find hard to talk about.  Let me explain it this way. 
Referring to artists, John Paul II said that, "In shaping a masterpiece, the artist not only summons his work into being, but also . . . reveals his own personality by means of it."  In other words, "works of art speak of their authors; they enable us to know their inner life."  This is quite normal.  But it also poses a danger.  A key temptation of our age is the will to power.  It is most obvious in our politics and science; in the constant erosion of our respect for the weak, the infirm, the unborn and the disabled.  But the impulse to pride -- that hunger to smash taboos and inflate the self - appeals most naturally to artists and other creators of high culture.  Genius breeds vanity.  And vanity breeds conflict and suffering.  The vanity of creative genius has a pedigree that leads back a very long way; all the way back to the very first non serviam from Satan himself.
It is very odd that in the wake of the bloodiest century in history - a century when tens of millions of human beings were shot, starved, gassed and incinerated with superhuman ingenuity - even many religious leaders are embarrassed to talk about the devil.  In fact, it is more than odd.  It is revealing.  Mass murder and exquisitely organized cruelty are not just really big "mental health" problems.  They are sins that cry out to heaven for justice, and they carry the fingerprints of an Intelligence who is personal, gifted, calculating and powerful.  The devil is only unbelievable if we imagine him as the black monster of medieval paintings, or think The Inferno is intended as a literal road map to hell.  Satan was very real for Jesus.  He was very real for Paul and the other great saints throughout history.  And he is profoundly formidable.  If we want a sense of the grandeur of the Fallen Angel before he fell, the violated genius of who Satan really is, we can take a hint from the Rilke poem The Angels:
. . . when they spread their wings
they waken a great wind through the land:
as though with his broad sculptor-hands
God was turning
the leaves of the dark book of the Beginning.
This is the kind of Being - once glorious, but then consumed by his own pride -- who is now the Enemy of humanity.  This is the Pure Spirit who betrayed his own greatness.  This is the Intellect who hates the Incarnation because through it, God invites creatures of clay like you and me to take part in God's own divinity.  There is nothing sympathetic about Satan; only tragedy and loss and enduring, brilliant anger.
In 1929, as the great totalitarian murder-regimes began to rise up in Europe, the philosopher Raissa Maritain wrote a forgotten little essay called The Prince of This World. It is worth reading.  We need to remember her words today and into the future.  With no trace of irony or metaphor, Maritain argued:
"Lucifer has cast the strong though invisible net of illusion upon us.  He makes one love the passing moment above eternity, uncertainty above truth.  He persuades us that we can only love creatures by making Gods of them.  He lulls us to sleep (and he interprets our dreams); he makes us work.  Then does the spirit of man brood over stagnant waters.  Not the least of the devil's victories is to have convinced artists and poets that he is their necessary, inevitable collaborator and the guardian of their greatness.  Grant him that, and soon you will grant him that Christianity is unpracticable.  Thus does he reign in this world."
If we do not believe in the devil, sooner or later we will not believe in God.  We cannot cut Lucifer out of the ecology of salvation.  Satan is not God's equal.  He is a created being subject to God and already, by the measure of eternity, defeated.  Nonetheless, he is the first author of pride and rebellion, and the great seducer of man.  Without him the Incarnation and Redemption do not make sense, and the cross is meaningless.  Satan is real.  There is no way around this simple truth. 
Let me underline that even more strongly.  Leszek Kolakowski, the former Marxist philosopher who died just last year, was one of the great minds of the last century.  He was never a religious person in the traditional sense.  But Kolakowski had few doubts about the reality of the devil.  In his essay Short Transcript of a Metaphysical Press Conference Given by the Demon in Warsaw, on 20th December 1963*, Kolakowski's devil indicts all of us who call ourselves "modern" Christians with the following words:
"Where is there a place [in your thinking] for the fallen angel? . . . Is Satan only a rhetorical figure? . . . Or else, gentlemen, is he a reality, undeniable, recognized by tradition, revealed in the Scriptures, commented upon by the Church for two millennia, tangible and acute?  Why do you avoid me, gentlemen?  Are you afraid that the skeptics will mock you, that you will be laughed at in satirical late night reviews?  Since when is the faith affected by the jeers of heathens and heretics?  What road are you taking?  If you forsake the foundations of the faith for fear of mockery, where will you end?  If the devil falls victim to your fear [of embarrassment] today, God's turn must inevitably come tomorrow.  Gentlemen, you have been ensnared by the idol of modernity, which fears ultimate matters and hides from you their importance.  I don't mention it for my own benefit - it is nothing to me - I am talking about you and for you, forgetting for a moment my own vocation, and even my duty to propagate error."*
We live in an age that imagines itself as post-modern and post-Christian.  It is a time defined by noise, urgency, action, utility and a hunger for practical results.  But there is nothing really new about any of this.  I think St. Paul would find our age rather familiar.  For all of the rhetoric about "hope and change" in our politics, our urgencies hide a deep unease about the future; a kind of well-manicured selfishness and despair.   The world around us has a hole in its heart, and the emptiness hurts.  Only God can fill it.  In our baptism, God called each of us in this room today to be his agents in that work.  Like St. Paul, we need to be "doers of the word, and not hearers only" (Jas 1:22).  We prove what we really believe by our willingness, or our refusal, to act on what we claim to believe. 
But when we talk about a theme like today's topic - "Priests and laity together, changing and challenging the culture" - we need to remember that what we do, proceeds from who we are.  Nothing is more dead than faith without works (Jas 2:17); except maybe one thing: works without faith.  I do not think Paul had management issues in his head when he preached at the Areopagus.  Management and resources are important - but the really essential questions, the questions that determine everything else in our life as Christians, are these:  Do I really know God?  Do I really love him?  Do I seek him out?  Do I study his word?  Do I listen for his voice?  Do I give my heart to him?  Do I really believe he's there?
For more than 30 years, first as a bishop and now as the successor to St. Peter, Benedict XVI has spoken often and very forcefully about the "culture of relativism" that guides today's developed world, breaks down human community and intimacy, and drains the meaning out of human activity.  That culture flows out of the "new Areopagus" John Paul II described in Redemptoris Missio - a culture formed by radically new technologies and methods of communication; a culture with a power that reshapes how we think, what we think about, and how we organize our personal and social lives.
We have an obligation as Catholics to study and understand the world around us.  We have a duty not just to penetrate and engage it, but to convert it to Jesus Christ.  That work belongs to all of us equally: clergy, laity and religious.  We are missionaries.  That is our primary vocation; it is hardwired into our identity as Christians.  God calls each of us to different forms of service in his Church.  But we are all equal in baptism.  And we all share the same mission of bringing the Gospel to the world, and bringing the world to the Gospel.
And yet, Kolakowski's devil was right.  The fundamental crisis of our time, and the special crisis of today's Christians, has nothing to do with technology, or numbers, or organization, or resources.  It is a crisis of faith.  Do we believe in God or not?  Are we on fire with a love for Jesus Christ, or not?  Because if we are not, nothing else matters.  If we are, then everything we need in order to do God's work will follow, because he never abandons his people.
I began this talk today with the words of a poet, so I will end with the words of another poet.  You may not have heard of him here in Italy.  His name was Dante Alighieri, and he wrote an interesting little work calledThe Divine Comedy.  He ends the Paradiso and the entire Comedy with these words:  "The Love which moves the sun and the other stars."
The Love which moves the sun and the other stars. That is the nature of the God we preach.  A God so great in glory, heat, light and majesty that he can populate the heavens and call life out of dead space; yet so intimate that he became one of us; so humble that he entered our world on dirt and straw to redeem us.  I think we can be forgiven for sometimes running away from that kind of love, like a child who runs away from a parent, because we simply cannot understand or compete with that ocean of unselfishness.  It is only when we give ourselves to God that we understand, finally, that we were made to do exactly that.  Our hearts are restless until they rest in him.  We should not be afraid to believe and to love; it took even a great saint like Augustine half a lifetime to be able to admit, that "late have I loved thee, Beauty so old and so new; late have I loved thee."
God calls us to leave here today and make disciples of all nations.  But he calls us first to love him.  If we do that, and do it zealously, with all our hearts - the rest will follow.
* Excerpt taken from "The Key to Heaven and Conversations with the Devil," translated by Celina Wieniewska and Salvator Attanasio (New York, Grove Press, 1972; pp. 117-129). This book may be out of print, but should be available for check-out at any local public library.

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Happy Birthday Mary! - A Meditation on the Birthday of the Blessed Virgin Mary


Meditation on the Birthday of the Blessed Virgin Mary

The History of the Liturgical Celebration of Mary's Birth
[Mary's Birth; Master of the Pfullendorf Altar][Mary's Birth; Master of the Pfullendorf Altar]
The Churches of Constantinople in the East and Rome in the West celebrate liturgies in honor of Mary's birth from the sixth and seventh centuries on. The origin of the liturgy is traced to the consecration of the church in Jerusalem in the sixth century that has been traditionally known as St. Ann's Basilica. The original church built in the fifth century was a Marian basilica erected on the spot known as the shepherd's field and thought to have been the home of Mary's parents. After its destruction and reconstruction in the sixth century, the basilica was named in honor of St. Ann.
By the seventh century the liturgy was also celebrated in Rome where it had been introduced by monks from the East. From there, it spread throughout the West, and by the thirteenth century the liturgy had developed to a solemnity with a major octave (eight days of commemoration prior to the liturgy) and a solemn vigil which prescribed a fastday. Pope Sergius I (687-701) established a procession (a litania) from the Roman Forum to St. Mary Major for the feast.
During the reform of St. Pius X, the octave was simplified, and in 1955 Pius XII abolished it. The liturgy received the rank of feast.
The date, September 8, was chosen as the eighth day (an octave) after the former Byzantine New Year. Although Mary's birth was celebrated on various dates throughout the centuries, September 8 predominated. The feast celebrating Mary's Immaculate Conception, December 8, (a liturgy instituted later) was set to correspond to nine months before Mary's birth.
In the East, Mary's birthday is celebrated as one of the twelve great liturgies. The title for the liturgy in the East: "The Birth of Our Exalted Queen, the Birthgiver of God and Ever-Virgin Mary." Around 560, Romanos the Melodist wrote a Kontakion for the celebration. The oldest existing sermon for the liturgy was written by St. Andrew of Crete:
[Geburt Mariae; Marx Reichlich][Geburt Mariae; Marx Reichlich]
The present feast forms a link between the New and the Old Testament. It shows that Truth succeeds symbols and figures and that the New Covenant replaces the Old. Hence, all creation sings with joy, exalts, and participates in the joy of this day. ... This is, in fact, the day on which the Creator of the world constructed His temple; today is the day on which, by a stupendous project, a creature becomes the preferred dwelling of the Creator.
The responsory for the liturgy proclaims:
Your birth, Birthgiver of God, announced joy to the whole world. From you came the Sun of Justice, Christ our God. He released the curse and gave the blessing.
The Spiritual Tradition Regarding Mary's Birth
Sacred Scripture does not record Mary's birth. The earliest known writing regarding Mary's birth is found in theProtoevangelium of James (5:2), which is an apocryphal writing from the late second century. What matters is not the historicity of the account, but the significance of Mary's and of every person's birth. In Mary's case, the early Church grew more and more interested in the circumstances surrounding the origin of Christ. Discussion about Mary throws light on the discussion about the identity of Jesus Christ.
The Church usually celebrates the passing of a person, that is, the person's entry into eternal life. Besides the birth of Christ, the Christian liturgy celebrates only two other birthdays: that of St. John the Baptizer and of Mary, the Mother of Jesus. It is not the individual greatness of these saints that the Church celebrates, but their role in salvation history, a role directly connected to the Redeemer's own coming into the world.

Mary's birth lies at the confluence of the two Testaments--bringing to an end the stage of expectation and the promises and inaugurating the new times of grace and salvation in Jesus Christ. Mary, the Daughter of Zion and ideal personification of Israel, is the last and most worthy representative of the People of the Old Covenant but at the same time she is "the hope and the dawn of the whole world." With her, the elevated Daughter of Zion, after a long expectation of the promises, the times are fulfilled and a new economy is established. (Lumen Gentium 55)The birth of Mary is ordained in particular toward her mission as Mother of the Savior. Her existence is indissolubly connected with that of Christ: it partakes of a unique plan of predestination and grace. God's mysterious plan regarding the Incarnation of the Word embraces also the Virgin who is His Mother. In this way, the Birth of Mary is inserted at the very heart of the History of Salvation. (M. Valentini, Dictionary of Mary, pp. 36-7.)
Representations of Mary's Birth in Art
Mary's birth is usually included as one panel in art series on Mary's lifestory; however, it is also a theme depicted by itself. The oldest known representation is on a sixth century diptych in Leningrad. From the very beginning, the paintings were modeled on the type used for the birth of Christ, where the mother is in a lying position. Instead of a landscape, a cave or a stable as in the birth of Christ, various types of architectural structures are depicted which represent an interior dwelling place. Ann, the mother of Mary, is lying on a couch or on a bed. Usually, servants are busy bathing the child. Starting around 980 the compositions depict three women. One very simple painting, the so-called Berlin diptych from the early twelfth century, shows a servant handing Ann a bowl, while the child lays all tucked in on a little bed. These representations show the natural and joyful event of Mary's birth.
[Anne Conceiving the Virgin;
Bellegambe][Anne Conceiving the Virgin; Bellegambe]
Other works place the stress on the destiny of the child and the teachings of the faith. Pietro Lorenzetti (1342, Siena,Museum dell'Opera del Duomo) places the birth in a side room of a church. On Wolf Huber's Field Church altar, angels participate in the birth through an opening in the heavens. Albrecht Altdorfer places Mary's birth in a church with pillars surrounded by angels (1525, Munich, Alte Pinakothek). During the baroque and the rococo periods, heaven and earth unite in the paintings in happy profusion at Mary's birth.
[Birth of the Virgin (detail); Murillo]
  [Birth of the Virgin (detail); Murillo]
During the later periods, especially after the fifteenth century, the representations of the birth of Mary highlight her destiny as the immaculate virgin, the child predestined by God's choice to bear the God-man, Jesus Christ. The words of the mystic, Mary of Agreda (1602-1665), describe well the way art would attempt to depict this birth. Mary of Agreda wrote, "Not only was the Word conceived before all these by eternal generation from the Father, but His temporal generation from the Virgin Mother full of grace, had already been decreed and conceived in the divine mind. Inasmuch as no efficacious and complete decree of this temporal generation could exist without at the same time including his Mother, such a Mother, the most holy Mary, was then and there conceived within that beautiful immensity, and her eternal record was written in the bosom of the Divinity, in order that for all the ages it should never be blotted out. She was stamped and delineated in the mind of the eternal Artificer and possessed the inseparable embraces of his love."
The Prayer of the Church
The Church prays at midday in the Liturgy of the Hours:

Today is the birthday of the holy Virgin Mary whose life illumined all the Churches.

In many cultures, the birthday of every person merits a celebration. Family and friends gather to wish the "birthday child" many happy returns. There are well-wishing, balloons, cards, cakes, candles, a favorite meal, there are gifts and jests--all the things that say, at least once a year, "You are special, there's only one of you, we are happy that you exist." So, it is for the people of God and Mary.
[Birth of the Virgin; The Hours of Catherine of Cleves]
The Byzantine Daily Worship gives us the following prayer:
[Birth of the Virgin; The Hours of Catherine of Cleves]
Come, all you faithful, let us hasten to the Virgin: for long before her conception in the womb, the one who was to be born of the stem of Jesse was destined to be the Mother of God. The one who is the treasury of virginity, the flowering Rod of Aaron, the object of the prophecies, the child of Joachim and Anne, is born today and the world is renewed in her. Through her birth, she floods the church with her splendor. O holy Temple, Vessel of the Godhead, Model of virgins and Strength of kings: in you the wondrous union of the two natures of Christ was realized. We worship Him and glorify your most pure birth, and we magnify you. (441-442)

Author: Father Johann G. Roten, S.M.


Sources: Christopher O'Donnell, At Worship with Mary; E. Sebald, "Kunstgeschichte," and L. Heiser, "Liturgie Ost," and Th. Mass-Ewerd, "Liturgie West," inMarienlexikon 2; A. Valentini, Dictionary of Mary; Jean Guitton, The Madonna.

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

So why are we called the 'Newman' Catholic Student Ministry?

What Newman Centers Owe Their Namesake (Part 1)


Interview With Oratorian Priest, Director of Newman Institute

By Kathleen Naab

PITTSBURGH, Pennsylvania, AUG. 30, 2010 (Zenit.org).- The dossier for Cardinal John Henry Newman's beatification does not list Catholic university centers that bear his name among the miracles the soon-to-be-blessed gained through his intercession.
And yet, Newman Centers could be considered one of the cardinal's first works from heaven.
This is the lighthearted suggestion made by Oratorian Father Drew Morgan, provost of the Pittsburgh Oratory of St. Philip Neri. As an Oratorian priest, Father Morgan is a member of Cardinal Newman's own congregation. Leading up to the cardinal's September beatification, ZENIT spoke with Father Morgan about the mark the English convert has left on the world of the Church in universities.
In addition to sharing Cardinal Newman's spirituality, the Pennsylvania-native priest served for 15 years at one of the Newman Centers with the best reputations in the United States. Father Morgan was ordained for the Oratory in 1985 and has a 1997 doctorate from Duquesne University where he wrote his dissertation on Cardinal Newman’s understanding of conscience. He is presently the director of the National Institute for Newman Studies.


Father Morgan: According to John Evans, author of a history of the Newman Clubs titled "The Newman Movement": "Reaction to supposed anti-Catholicism certainly accounted for the origin of the first Catholic student organization in secular higher education."
The very first meeting of such a “club” was on Thanksgiving Day, 1883, in Madison, Wisconsin, where Catholic students were enjoying the holiday at the home of Mr. and Mrs. John C. Melvin, who lived across the street from the University of Wisconsin. In the course of the evening, one of the students mentioned that a professor had slandered the Catholic Church in his treatment of “medieval institutions.” His fellow Catholic students began a discussion as to whether such discourse was, indeed, slanderous, or appropriate, given the state of the Church in that period of history.
The students continued to meet at this home for further discussion and fellowship, constituting the beginning of the “Melvin Club.” It was the first organized manifestation of Catholic students coming together on a secular college campus.

One of the students who participated in the meetings of the Melvin Club was Timothy Harrington. He eventually found his way to graduate studies at the University of Pennsylvania (Penn). During a semester break, Harrington reread Newman’s autobiography, "Apologia pro Vita Sua." Inspired by Newman’s ability to defend the faith and his ideas about university education for Catholic students, Harrington drew on his experience in Wisconsin and initiated the first “Newman Club.” It followed a similar format, incorporating social activities, discussions on the faith, and mutual support for Catholic students in a frequently hostile academic environment. The meetings often became occasions for dating and debating, essentially providing a Catholic culture in a secular environment.
Surprisingly, Newman Centers emerged in the United States only three years after Newman’s death in Birmingham, England. The group at Penn held their first meeting in 1893. It is often thought that this could well be one of Newman’s first great miracles! It certainly is an affirmation of the power of his charismatic influence upon the life of the Church in the English-speaking world and his ongoing efforts from above to assist Catholic students in their most formative academic years.
Today, Newman Clubs or “Centers” can be found on almost every secular college campus in the United States, although one of the earliest clubs was at the University of Toronto in Canada. Frequently, and unfortunately, the Newman name is no longer tied to this ministry and the work is identified as “campus ministry.” Nevertheless, the mission can be traced to the Newman Club movement.
Eventually, the Newman movement became essential for the pastoral care of a growing population of Catholics attending secular colleges and universities. The return of the servicemen after World War II and the emergence of the “baby boom” generation swelled the ranks of Catholics seeking higher education at these institutions. The response of the institutional Church was to provide not only encouragement for Catholic faculty and students to associate with one another, but also the assignment of a Newman chaplain for their spiritual and sacramental needs.
The Newman movement eventually became know as the “Newman Apostolate,” and after Vatican II was placed under the aegis of the Catholic Campus Ministry Association by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.



ZENIT: Can a Newman Center replace what a student stands to gain from attending a university that is itself Catholic?

Father Morgan: This is an interesting question that provides insight into an entirely different role that Newman played in the development of the modern American university. Throughout the 1850s, Newman served as rector of the Catholic University of Ireland, which he was asked to found by the Irish bishops. At the beginning of each academic year and as each college of the university was established, Newman would deliver an opening lecture or an address that powerfully illustrated insights into the role of the various disciplines of higher education. Newman took great strides in establishing the role that the Church should play in promoting the study of that particular field.
The collection of his lectures and these opening addresses constitute his great work, "The Idea of a University." This work was used as the essential “blueprint” by the religious orders that were rapidly founding Catholic colleges and universities throughout the United States. Their work was seen as a necessary completion of the work that the Church had initiated for her students in the parochial school system. In one generation, American Catholics went from being uneducated new immigrants to educated citizens capable of engaging the broader culture. The contribution made by Newman to this great work is yet another manifestation of the power of his charismatic leadership in the area of university education.
To address your question about Catholic vs. secular education, originally, the Newman Clubs hoped to be the appropriate response to this issue. However, many pastors and even a few bishops felt that Catholic students attending non-Catholic institutions were placing themselves in near-occasions of sin and therefore should no longer receive Communion! The safeguarding of the faith today paradoxically may in fact be more secure in a vibrant Newman Center on a secular college campus, where students are regularly challenged to defend their faith and give an account of their beliefs.
Of course Catholic universities can provide quality education in all areas, introducing the Catholic perspective in each discipline, as well as the teaching of the faith through their faculties of theology. This was really Newman’s great contribution to the very meaning of a “university” education, where universal Truth would be pursued, including the Truth found in theology and the teachings of the Church.





[Part 2 of this interview will appear in a later post]



On the Net:



The National Institute for Newman Studies: www.newmanstudiesinstitute.org





Prayer for Cardinal Newman’s canonization: www.newmancause.co.uk/prayer.html